NewVision University Logo
Georgian Law Review Logo

Georgian Law Review - Volume 22. 2022

ArticleGeopolitical Connections to Legal Debate: Methodological Experimentations Between Legal Transplants and Power Struggles
Author(s)Anna Marotta
Pages125-157

Geopolitical Connections to Legal Debate: Methodological Experimentations Between Legal Transplants and Power Struggles

Keywords
Comparative Law
Geopolitical conflict
Sharia
“Sharia Court”
Abstract

Social antagonisms resulting from the coexistence of a variety of cultural groups and their rule systems in globalised societies may give rise to geopolitical conflicts, that is power struggles over a territory. Such conflicts may affect legal debate. This becomes apparent in the controversy over the institutionalization process of Islamic Alternative Dispute Resolution in England, which has resulted in mediation and arbitration bodies which are widely represented as parallel legal courts and, as such, indistinctly called “sharia courts”. The complexity of multi-faceted phenomena such as “sharia courts”, which show the mutual influence between geopolitical dynamics and legal developments, requires new disciplinary approaches. “Geo-Law”, as a methodology that combines comparative law and geopolitics to address geopolitical conflicts arising from the circulation of legal rules, tries precisely to offer a new analytical perspective. The “geo-legal” analysis reveals that the debate concerning the functioning of English “sharia courts“ direct legal evolution in different ways. On the one hand, there are calls for changes to domestic laws in order to review the application of sharia-based rules, especially in family law matters. On the other hand, „sharia courts” seem to have become a model of Islamic justice in the eyes of Muslims from other countries, who resort to these structures not only to solve their disputes, but also to be trained as “judges” and replicate that model in their own countries. In shedding light on the content of the English common law system and the Islamic model and in reconstructing the main events of the geopolitical conflict, the present paper uses “geo-law” as a key to illustrate and understand the unexpected evolution between the involved legal systems and their core values.

References

1. Ajani, G., Francavilla, D., Pasa, B., Diritto comparato: Lezioni e materiali, Torino, Giappichelli G. ed., 2018;
2. Bano, S., Muslim Women and Shari‘ah Councils: Transcending the Boundaries of Community and Law, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012;
3. Bingham, J., At Least 85 Sharia Courts’ Operating in Britain, Says Civitas Report, The Telegraph, 29 June 2009, http://www.telegraph.co.uk;
4. Bowen, I., Medina in Birmingham Najaf in Brent: Inside British Islam, London, Hurst and Company, 2014;
5. Bowen, J. R., On British Islam: Religion, Law and Everyday Practice in Shari´a Councils, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2016;
6. Bowen, J. R., Panorama's Exposé of Sharia Councils didn't Tell the Full Story, The Guardian, 26 April 2013, https://www.theguardian.com;
7. Boztas, S., Sharia Courts: the Inside story, The Independent, 5 December 2015 (article no longer available).
8. Bussani, M., Il diritto dell’Occidente: Geopolitica delle regole globali, Torino, Einaudi, 2010;
9. Butler-Sloss, E., Hill, M., Family law: Current Conflict and their Resolution, Islam and English Law: Rights, Responsibilities and the Place of Shari‘a, Griffith-Jones, R. ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013;
10. Castro, F., Il modello islamico, Piccinelli, G. M. ed., 2nd edition, Torino, G. Giappichelli Editore, 2007;
11. Cox, C., A Parallel World: Confronting the abuse of many Muslim women in Britain today, The Bow Group, 2015, https://bowgroup.org/bow-group-report-a-parallel-world-confronting-the-abuse-of-muslim-women-in-britain/;
12. Cranmer, F., The Council of Europe and Sharia: An Unsatisfactory Resolution? Ecclesiastical Law Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2019;
13. Dassetto, F., ‘L’ “islam europeo” e i suoi volti’, Islam in Europa/Islam in Italia tra Diritto e Società, Ferrari, A. ed., Bologna, Società Editrice il Mulino, 2008;
14. Dassetto, F., L’islam in Europa, Torino, Edizioni della Fondazione Giovanni Agnelli, 1994.
15. Doughty, S., Britain has 85 Sharia Courts: The Astonishing Spread of Islamic Justice Behind Closed Doors, Daily Mail, 29 June 2009, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1196165/Britain-85-sharia-courts-The-astonishing-spread-Islamic-justice-closed-doors.html;
16. Genn, H., What is Civil Justice For? Reform, ADR, and Access to Justice, Yale Journal of Law & Humanities, Vol. 24, No. 1, Art. 18, 2012;
17. Giblin, B., La géopolitique: un raisonnement géographique d'avant-garde, Hérodote, No. 146-147, 2012/2013-4;
18. Giblin, B., Les conflits dans le monde: approche géopolitique, Collection U, Paris, Armand Colin, 2012;
19. Griffith-Jones, R., The Unavoidable Adoption of Shari‘a Law - the Generation of a Media Storm, Islam and English Law: Rights, Responsibilities and the Place of Shari‘a, Griffith-Jones, R. ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013;
20. Grillo, R., Muslim Families, Politics and the Law: A Legal Industry in Multicultural Britain, Farnham, Ashgate, 2015;
21. Hirsch, A., Dozens of Sharia Courts Are Giving Illegal Advice, Claims Civitas Report, The Guardian, 29 June 2009, https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/jun/29/sharia-courts-illegal-advice-claims;
22. Hall, M., Britain Has at least 85 Sharia Law Courts, Daily Express, 29 June 2009, http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/110672/Britain-has-at-least-85-Sharia-law-courts.
23. Irti, N., Norma e Luoghi. Problemi di geo-diritto, Bari, Editori Laterza, 2006;
24. Keshavjee, M. M., Islam, Sharia & Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mechanisms for Legal Redress in the Muslim Community, London, I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd, 2013;
25. Lacoste, Y., La géographie, la géopolitique et le raisonnement géographique, Hérodote, 2012/3-4 (No. 146-147);
26. Loyer, B., Géopolitique: Méthodes et concepts, Paris, Armand Colin, 2019;
27. MacEoin, D., Sharia Law or ‘One Law for All’? Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society, London, 2009;
28. Maret, R. E., ‘Mind the Gap: The Equality Bill and Sharia Arbitration in the United Kingdom’, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2013;
29. Marotta, A., A Geo-Legal Approach to the English Sharia Courts: Cases and Conflicts, Volume 1, Comparative Law in Global Perspective, Bussani, M., Della, C. ed., Brill, 2021;
30. McGoldrick, D., Sharia Law in Europe? Legacies of the Ottoman Empire and the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2019;
31. McVeigh, K., Hill, A., Bill Limiting Sharia Law is Motivated by “Concern” for Muslim Women, The Guardian, 8 June 2011, https://www.theguardian.com/law/2011/jun/08/sharia-bill-lords-muslim-women;
32. Molloy, A., Islamic Law to be Enshrined in British Law as Solicitors Get Guidelines on “Sharia Compliant” Wills, The Independent, 2014, https://www.independent.co.uk/;
33. Nielsen, J. S., United Kingdom: An Early Discussion on Islamic Family Law in the English Jurisdiction, Applying Shari‘a in the West: Facts, Fears and the Future of Islamic Rules on Family Relations in the West, Berger, M. S. ed., Leiden, Leiden University Press, 2013;
34. Patel, P., Sahgal, G., Withewashing Sharia councils in the UK? Open Democracy, 4 July 2016, https://www.opendemocracy.net/pragna-patel-gita-sahgal/whitewashing-sharia-councils-in-uk;
35. Pearl, D. S., Menski, W., Muslim Family Law, London, Sweet and Maxwell, 1998;
36. Perraudin, F., Muslim Women Used as Political Footballs in Saria Court Debate, The Guardian, 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/nov/01/muslim-women-used-as-political-footballs-in-sharia-court-debate;
37. Proudman, C. R., Equal and Free? Evidence in Support of Baroness Cox’s Arbitration and Mediation Services (Equality) Bill, 2012, http://www.secularism.org.uk/uploads/equal-and-free-16.pdf;
38. Reid, L., First UK Sharia Court Up and Running in Warwickshire, Coventry Telegraph, 9 September 2008, https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/local-news/first-uk-sharia-court-up-3092052 ; Taher, A., Revealed: UK’s first official sharia courts’, The Sunday Times, 14 September 2008, https://onelawforall.org.uk/uk’s-first-official-sharia-courts/; Edwards, R., Sharia Courts Operating in Britain, The Telegraph, 14 September 2008, https://www.telegraph.co.uk;
39. Rohe, M., Reasons for the Application of Shari῾a in the West, Applying Shari῾a in the West: Facts, Fears and the Future of Islamic Rules on Family Relations in The West, Berger, M. S. ed., Leiden, Leiden University Press, 2013;
40. Sacco, R., Antropologia giuridica: Contributo ad una macrostoria del diritto, Bologna, Società editrice il Mulino, 2007;
41. Sacco, R., Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 39, 1991;
42. Shachar, A., Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s rights, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001;
43. Siddiqui, M., et al, The Independent Review into the Application of Sharia Law in England and Wales, Home Office, 1 February 2018, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/678478/6.4152_HO_ CPFG_Report_into_Sharia_Law_in_the_UK_WEB.pdf;
44. The Oxford Handbook of European Islam, Cesari, J. ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015;
45. Vora, V., The Continuing Muslim Marriage Conundrum: The Law of England and Wales on Religious Marriage and Non-Marriage in the United Kingdom’, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2020;
46. Williams, R., Civil and Religious Law in England: a religious perspective, Islam and English Law: Rights, Responsibilities and the Place of Shari‘a, Griffith-Jones, R. ed., Cambridge, University Press, 2013;
47. Yilmaz, I., Challenge of Post-modern Legality and Muslim Legal Pluralism in England’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2002;
48. Zee, M., Choosing Sharia? Multiculturalism, Islamic Fundamentalism and Sharia Councils, Eleven International Publishing, 2015.
49. HM Government, Integrated Communities Strategy Green Paper: Building stronger, more united communities, March 2018;
50. Home Affairs Committe, Sharia Councils Inquiry, 2016, https://old.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/home-affairs-committee/inquiries/parliament-2015/inquiry6/;
51. Home Affairs Committee, Sharia Councils Inquiry Launched, 24 June 2016, https://old.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/home-affairs-committee/news-parliament-2015 /160623-new-inquiry-sharia-councils/;
52. Home Office, A Stronger Britain, Built on Our Values: A New Partnership to Defeat Extremism (Speech), 23 March 2015, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/a-stronger-britain-built-on-our-values;
53. Home Office, Independent Review into Sharia Law Launched, 26 May 2016, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/independent-review-into-sharia-law-launched;
54. Law Commission, Weddings, https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/weddings/;
55. One Law for All, Boycott the Sharia Law Inquiry: Organisers Call on Women’s Rights Campaigners and Organisations to Boycott the Sharia Law Inquiry, 15 July 2016, http://onelawforall.org.uk/boycott-the-sharia-law-inquiry/.
56. One Law for All, Campaign against Sharia law in Britain, 2008, https://onelawforall.org.uk/about/.
57. Panorama, Secrets of Britain’s Sharia Councils, Part 1, [online video], 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gZCFdHkd4A, and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQ3PIhFHDdE.
58. The Christian Institute, Mep Speaks Against Spread of Sharia Courts, 18 April 2013, http://www.christian.org.uk/news/mep-speaks-out-against-spread-of-sharia-courts/;
59. The Islamic Sharia Council, Response to Baroness Cox’s Arbitration and Mediation Bill, 2012, http://www.islamic-sharia.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Booklet-on-Coxs-Bill-Sep-2013.-2-1.pdf;
60. Akhter v. Khan [2018] EWFC 54 (Fam), [2020] EWCA Civ. 122;
61. Al Midani and another v. Al Midani and others (Lloyds Rep 923 (1999) C.L. R 904);
62. Jivraj v. Hashwani [2010] EWCA Civ. 712; [2011] UKSC 40;
63. Khan v Khan [2007] EWCA Civ. 399; Bhatti v. Bhatti [2009] EWHC 3506;
64. Molla Sali v. Greece, Application no. 20452/14, 2018, ECtHR (GC);
65. Uddin v. Choudhury [2009] (EWCA Civ. 1205).];
66. https://the.ismaili/cab/ncab-uk
67. http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Getting_Married_scoping_paper.pdf.